Violence, struggling, death, and survival are all endless cycles which plague our everyday world. I bring this topic up because the book I am currently reading the book The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. The book takes place in a distant future North America where it is basically divided into separate districts. The government forces two teenagers, one girl and boy, to fight to the death in the wilderness. They must hunt for their own food, water, and whatever other few supplies are available to them. They also have access to weapons in order to protect themselves. The government forces the children to fight against each other in order to show the public that they have control over everyone even the children. It is both horrible and sad to see how the children are pitted against each other. I mean they are destroying their future and lives by going through this.
Anyways to go back to my first sentence about violence and survival, I believe that the purpose of Suzanna Collins writing this book was to open our eyes to the ugly side of life, the side of war. When I think of war, I tend to think of men having an assault rifle and infiltrating a base and some other related thing, but the sad truth about war is that many children my age or just a little bit older get in the middle. In many nations, young men three or four years older than me are given training and are sent out to basically be slaughtered. This connects to the book because even though the children are not going into war with another nation they are still being used by the government. Either way many of them are going to die.
I would also like to say that this book touches upon the issue of governments having too much power over their people and exploiting them in certain ways. The topic of war and governments having too much power are closely related because often times when a government has too much power, another country steps in to fix this. A modern day example of this is how the US has gotten itself involved in Libya in order to kick out the president Ghadafi. Back to the book, an example where the government shows an over exertion of power is when they already have the teens in the hunger games, but they set up a perfect scenario for bloodshed, "When food is scarce, the game makers will invite players to a banquet, somewhere none to all like the cornucopia, as an inducement to gather and fight" (244). This quote portrays the image of how the government is corrupt and will exercise its immense power in order to strike fear into the public. It also demonstrates how the government does not seem to care about what the hell happens to the players the whole point of the banquet was to gather them up and to pit them against each other in a fight. This relates to war in general because troops are placed in specific areas on purpose because certain areas draw the attention of the enemy. Some troops are just used as a decoy or bait to draw out the enemy. It is sad but it is true.
To the naked eye The Hunger Games may seem like your typical novel about survival and violence, but upon further analysis the book reveals a deeper meaning of war and corrupt governments. Much like war, the children are put through hell and the cycle of violence, death, and survival continues to spread and infect the world like an epidemic.
for alex:
ReplyDeletethough your topic sentence is catching, it brings me a few questions that i would like answers. your "hooking/first sentence". you stated characteristics like Violence, struggling, death, and survival but where is the violence in the book? back it up. you also use used a vioce that is not meant to be used for such an essay, probably to fill up the minimal required 1000 words. you used unnecessary things/terms like "i mean". your draft is also very short and you will need to expand it if you are to get full credit. also, which question are you trying to answer? it would make it much easier to edit it.
In the introduction, there were some parts of it that were wrong. I insist that you read over your introduction. I agree with Jasiu where you needed more evidence. I like some of your quotes but the commentary is sometimes repetitive of the quote. Put of more of your opinions in there if you would like. I would also like to comment that sometimes, the paragraph might be distracted or it goes off topic.
ReplyDelete